Detainee Lawyer Must Leave Navy
(Washington Post) The Navy lawyer who led a successful Supreme Court challenge of the Bush administration’s military tribunals for detainees at Guantanamo Bay has been passed over for promotion and will have to leave the military, The Miami Herald reported Sunday. Lt. Cmdr. Charles Swift, 44, will retire in March or April under the military’s “up or out” promotion system. Swift said last week he was notified he would not be promoted to commander. He said the notification came about two weeks after the Supreme Court sided with him and against the White House in the case involving Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a Yemeni who was Osama bin Laden’s driver.
Mystech: As the Marine Col. Dwight Sullivan says below, “quite a coincidence”. I’m sensing a recruiting slogan here… An Army of One, less. 🙁
“It was a pleasure to serve,” Swift told the newspaper. He added he would have defended Hamdan even if he had known it would cut short his Navy career.
“All I ever wanted was to make a difference _ and in that sense I think my career and personal satisfaction has been beyond my dreams,” Swift said.
The Pentagon had no comment Sunday.
A graduate of the University of Seattle School of Law, Swift plans to continue defending Hamdan as a civilian.
The 36-year-old Hamdan was captured along the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan while fleeing the U.S. invasion that was a response to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Hamdan has acknowledged that bin Laden paid him $200 a month as his driver on a Kandahar farm, but he says he never joined al-Qaida or engaged in military fighting.
Hamdan turned to civilian courts to challenge the constitutionality of his war-crimes trial, a case that eventually led the Supreme Court to rule that President Bush had outstripped his authority when he created ad hoc military tribunals for prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Swift’s supervisor said he served with distinction.
“Charlie has obviously done an exceptional job, a really extraordinary job,” said Marine Col. Dwight Sullivan, the Pentagon’s chief defense counsel for Military Commissions. He added it was “quite a coincidence” that Swift was passed over for a promotion “within two weeks of the Supreme Court opinion.”
Washington, D.C., attorney Eugene Fidell, president of the National Institute of Military Justice, said Swift was “a no-brainer for promotion.” Swift joins many other distinguished Navy officers over the years who have seen their careers end prematurely, Fidell said.
“He brought real credit to the Navy,” Fidell said. “It’s too bad that it’s unrequited love.”
Swift was a former classmate of mine — here’s my tribute to him:
http://mountainphilosopher.blogspot.com/2006/10/lt-cmdr-charles-swift-defender-of-us.html
Been visiting your blog. I am really proud of the work you have been doing in the political arena. Keep it up. Dad
Thanks for the additional information John. I swung by your site and read your tribute to Swift. Nice work!
Instead of bashing the Navy, let’s congratulate him for leading by example and hope that others who would do the right thing continue to do so despite the consequences.
Did the Navy do the right thing? Hell, no. And now, the are getting bad press for it. I would be amazed if anyone could get as excited about who’s behind this as they are about inappropriate e-mails on Capital Hill.
Not a bash, just pointing out an obvious mistake on their part. The ability to recognize mistakes and correct them is vital to a good government or military. Blind approval and obedience is not patriotism or “supporting our troops” as one too many political slogans would have us believe. 🙂